villadocs.blogg.se

1. NETBEANS VS ECLIPSE INSTALL
2. NETBEANS VS ECLIPSE CODE

NETBEANS VS ECLIPSE CODE

my 2 biggest complaints are that i use a macro to scroll 10 lines up or down - webstorm is very slow and it's behavior depends on the code that i'm scrolling past, and it corrupts files if they're included in the project by symbolic link and version control changes them behind it's back. but the IDE itself doesn't feel as professional. the javascript support in webstorm is excellent, somewhat better than netbeans though still a long way from java. I've toyed with intellij and use webstorm (the dedicated javascript version) actively for javascript. I've tried eclipse several times and have never gotten it configured to the point that the shortcuts were the same during editing (in several languages) and debugging nor felt confident that i'd installed the "right" modules i'm guessing that all the IDEs do well in this regard Shortcuts are mostly consistent, eg i set alt-w as copy and it works in both the editor and the output windowĬode navigation is just incredible (i recently discovered shft-ctrl-b is "go to overriding methods"). i use git and between it, the markup, and local history (believe that eclipse is strong in this regard as well), i can recklessly make edits and then sift for gold

Version control markup is informative and non-intrusive. Visual diff is great for merges and even use it for non-code related things Netbeans is better out of the box.įor java and c/c++ i prefer netbeans.

NETBEANS VS ECLIPSE INSTALL

I found that Eclipse plugins vary wildly in terms of quality.Įclipse you have to tweak and customize and install plugins to make it usable.

Important plugins get pulled into "core" Netbeans, meaning they get much more testing and QA than independent Eclipse plugins. Refactoring- better in Eclipse, but good enough in Netbeans. Also, I like better how Eclipse and SVN/CVS works. Synchronize with repository view for SVN/CVS- current reason why I keep Eclipse around at all. Although I read somewhere that this is going to be greatly improved with next release of Eclipse. i wonder why IBM venture into software, they a hardware company and i think they are good at. I find this works better with current release of Netbeans, than it does with Eclipse. i would go for netbeans anyday anytime, it is richer than eclipse. I found Netbeans somewhat faster if I don't have an SSD. I estimate that some tasks in Eclipse became ~4x faster when I got an SSD. Both create a lot of small files, so having an SSD is very very helpful. Performance- this changes between releases, sometimes Eclipse seems faster, sometimes Netbeans. It provides a standalone C/C++ debugger application that is added to the CDT to help debug an application via the command line and have an Eclipse UI debugger pop up.I've been switching between Eclipse and Netbeans for a while. EcoreTools, the graphical modeler for Ecore, has been completely re-implemented based on Sirius and provides a nicer graphical design, support for documenting your model, specifying domain constraints and modeling Generic Types. Paho provides open source implementations of open and standard messaging protocols that support current and emerging requirements of M2M integration with Web and Enterprise middleware and applications. The Eclipse workbench provides a new dark theme, split editors, line numbers on by default, reduced whitespace in default presentation, ability to hide the "quick access" bar and fitting syntax highlighter setting for the editor of several programming languages. Eclipse Luna includes official support for Java 8 in the Java development tools, Plug-in Development Tools, Object Teams, Eclipse Communication Framework, Maven integration, Xtext, Xtend, Web Tools Platform, and Memory Analyzer.